Overview
Title
Establishing the Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities to develop a plan under which the functions and responsibilities of the Office of the United States Trade Representative shall be moved to the legislative branch in accordance with article I, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The resolution suggests creating a special group of helpers from Congress to figure out how to move some important tasks, like making trade deals with other countries, from the President's helpers to Congress. They want to make this change in about four years.
Summary AI
The resolution, H. CON. RES. 2, proposes to create a Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities, which will develop a plan to transfer the functions of the Office of the United States Trade Representative to the legislative branch. This committee will have 14 members from the House and Senate, and will work in consultation with a newly established Congressional Advisory Board. The plan aims to have these functions moved within four years or by July 1, 2028, whichever is later. Additionally, the United States Trade Representative and other executive offices are expected to provide support and information to the committee and advisory board for their activities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
This congressional resolution, referred to as the "Reclaiming Congress’s Constitutional Mandate in Trade Resolution," proposes establishing a special committee called the Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities. The primary objective of this resolution is to shift the duties of the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) from the executive branch to Congress, pursuant to Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. By creating both a committee and an advisory board, the resolution seeks to realign trade policy responsibilities more closely with congressional powers.
General Summary of the Bill
The resolution suggests forming a Joint Ad Hoc Committee composed of House and Senate members who will develop a detailed plan for transferring USTR responsibilities to the legislative branch. This committee will be bicameral, meaning it will include members from both the House of Representatives and the Senate, with appointments made by party leaders in each chamber. It will hold meetings, appoint necessary staff, and is required to produce a report within 16 months. In advising this committee, the bill also establishes a Congressional Advisory Board on Trade Responsibilities comprising individuals with expertise in various fields related to trade. This advisory body is to assist in creating a successful plan for the proposed transfer.
Significant Issues
The bill raises several important issues warranting consideration. Firstly, transferring the responsibilities of the U.S. Trade Representative to the legislative branch may lead to inefficiencies or redundancies, as these functions have historically been managed by the executive branch. Secondly, the appointment process of both the committee and the advisory board might favor the majority party, thereby introducing potential bias in trade policymaking. The ambiguous language regarding the extent of assistance that the USTR should provide and the timelines for reporting and termination could also result in operational hurdles.
Public Impact
For the general public, this resolution could mean a shift in how the U.S. approaches trade negotiations and policy development. This shift could introduce delays or make trade discussions more subjective to congressional processes, which are known to be lengthier than executive actions. While the resolution aims to increase Congress's role in trade policy, it could make the trade negotiation process more cumbersome, affecting timely decision-making on trade agreements that impact domestic industries.
Stakeholder Impact
For legislators, especially those in the majority party, this bill could amplify their influence over trade policies, aligning more closely with their legislative priorities and constituencies. Meanwhile, the executive branch faces a potential reduction in its traditional role in trade, which could impact how swiftly and effectively it maneuvers international agreements.
For industries relying on international trade, such as agriculture, manufacturing, and retail, this restructuring may introduce uncertainty and disrupt established timelines for trade negotiations. On the other hand, labor and consumer interest groups might view the increased congressional oversight as a platform to push for domestic-focused trade policies, potentially leading to more public discussions on trade effects on labor markets and consumer protection.
Overall, while the resolution seeks to constitutionally align trade functions, it bears potential challenges in its implementation and wider implications for U.S. trade operations and stakeholders.
Issues
The potential inefficiencies and duplication of efforts resulting from transferring functions of the Office of the United States Trade Representative to the legislative branch, as outlined in Section 2.
Ambiguity and potential for biased representation in the appointment process of the Joint Ad Hoc Committee and the Congressional Advisory Board, as majority parties appoint a majority of the members. This could lead to partisan outcomes, as described in Sections 2 and 3.
Lack of clarity on the specific outcomes, goals, and evaluation of the Congressional Advisory Board's effectiveness, leading to potential inefficiencies and accountability concerns, as highlighted in Section 3.
The overlapping timelines for the Joint Ad Hoc Committee's report submission and termination, which could lead to inefficient operations or excessive delays, as detailed in Section 2.
The vague language regarding the assistance and information required from the United States Trade Representative and other executive offices, which could lead to disputes and potential misuse of resources, as noted in Section 4.
The open-ended expense coverage for Advisory Board members' travel and per diem without specified limits, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending, as mentioned in Section 3.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 1, the resolution is given the official title "Reclaiming Congress’s Constitutional Mandate in Trade Resolution."
2. Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the creation of a Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities, composed of members from Congress, which is tasked with developing a plan to transfer the functions of the United States Trade Representative to the legislative branch. The committee has the authority to hold meetings, appoint staff, and report its findings to Congress within 16 months, and will terminate one year after submitting the report.
3. Congressional advisory board Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Congressional Advisory Board on Trade Responsibilities is created to provide advice on trade policy. It comprises 21 unpaid members with various backgrounds, including those with expertise in trade policy and representatives from different sectors. They help the Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities develop trade plans and will cease to exist a year after the Committee submits its required report.
4. Assistance of United States Trade Representative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The United States Trade Representative and other executive leaders are required to offer information and support to both the Joint Ad Hoc Committee on Trade Responsibilities and the Congressional Advisory Board on Trade Responsibilities. This assistance is meant to help these groups perform their duties effectively.