Overview
Title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
ELI5 AI
H. CON. RES. 117 is like a big plan for how the United States will spend and save its money from 2025 to 2034, making sure the country can pay for important things like defense and health, but it might be tricky to understand because some parts aren't super clear about where all the money will go or how it will be saved.
Summary AI
H. CON. RES. 117 outlines the United States congressional budget for the fiscal year 2025 and establishes appropriate budget levels for the years 2026 through 2034. The bill addresses budget enforcement rules and policy statements related to various issues such as economic growth, improper payments, higher education, Medicare, and border security. It also includes provisions to limit changes in certain mandatory programs, advance appropriations, and budget points of order in the House of Representatives. Additionally, the resolution emphasizes policies on deregulation, supporting the American workforce, and combating the opioid epidemic.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed congressional budget resolution for fiscal year 2025 sets the financial trajectory of the United States government through 2034. The resolution lays out recommended levels for federal revenues, budget authority, and deficits, among other financial indicators, while also introducing various policy statements and enforcement measures. This bill aims to replace prior budgets and establish new financial benchmarks for the coming years.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill outlines a comprehensive fiscal plan from 2025 to 2034, detailing how much the government expects to collect in revenues and how much it plans to spend. It sets guidelines for spending in major functional categories such as national defense, health, and education, and also provides measures to ensure fiscal responsibility within the House of Representatives. The bill also contains policy statements targeting economic growth, unauthorized appropriations, improper payments, and several key areas affecting American life, such as Medicare and border security.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from a detailed analysis of the bill's language and provisions. The language is often complex and technical, making it difficult to interpret specific budgetary allocations and policy intentions. Particular sections, such as those detailing reserve funds and budget adjustments, lack clarity, potentially resulting in ambiguous or inconsistent application. Moreover, some policy statements, like those regarding government deregulation and economic growth, are criticized for their perceived political bias, lacking a balanced viewpoint.
The bill's significant financial commitments are not always backed by detailed justifications or explanations, especially concerning large negative budget outlays in certain categories. Furthermore, sections like the 'Point of Order Against Increasing Long-Term Direct Spending' provide leeway for exceptions, which may weaken fiscal discipline by allowing some spending limits to be bypassed. Additionally, critical areas like reducing improper payments and Medicare challenges fail to outline specific strategies or actions, raising concerns about the effectiveness and accountability of these initiatives.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, this bill aims to establish financial stability and long-term economic growth. For the general public, this could mean more transparent and efficient government spending, potentially reducing waste and optimizing the distribution of resources. However, the complexities and ambiguities within the bill might lead to varied interpretations, affecting how well these intentions translate into practice. If the fiscal targets are met, the bill could alleviate some tax burdens over time by fostering a healthier economy without increasing federal revenues each year.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Different stakeholders stand to gain or lose from various provisions set out in the bill. Government agencies may face stricter budgetary constraints and oversight, pushing them to operate more efficiently. Policies favoring deregulation and lower taxes may benefit businesses, encouraging economic expansion and job creation. However, this could come at the cost of reduced oversight or funding necessary for regulatory compliance and public welfare.
Healthcare providers and beneficiaries, particularly those relying on Medicare, might feel the impact of policy proposals that lack specificity in addressing long-term financial sustainability. Changes or cuts in areas like Medicaid work requirements could affect vulnerable populations, including low-income individuals who depend on these programs for their well-being.
Overall, while the bill offers some promising paths towards economic stability and growth, stakeholders will need to navigate its complexities and occasional lack of transparency to ensure its objectives are met in a fair and balanced manner.
Financial Assessment
In analyzing H. CON. RES. 117, the congressional budget is established for the fiscal year 2025 and sets budgetary levels for 2026 through 2034. The bill delineates numerous financial allocations and adjustments across various categories, which are worth exploring given their implications.
Financial Allocations and Appropriations
The resolution outlines specific financial allocations across numerous fiscal years. For instance, it recommends federal revenue levels starting from $3.711 trillion in 2025 and growing to $5.672 trillion by 2034. Regarding new budget authority, it ranges from $4.986 trillion in 2025 to $5.869 trillion in 2034. These allocations indicate a steady increase in both revenue and new budget authority over the decade.
Specific categories also receive detailed financial treatment. National Defense, for instance, has new budget authority set at $921.721 billion for 2025, escalating to $1.104 trillion by 2034. The Health category begins with $776.720 billion in 2025 and increases each year to reach $866.907 billion by 2034. These figures highlight Congress's focus on sustained investment across major functional categories.
Issues with Financial References
Several issues arise regarding the clarity and implications of these financial allocations. For example, the "Major Functional Categories" section presents the "Allowances" category with negative budget authority and outlays, such as -$100.210 billion for 2025 and -$123.105 billion for 2034. This negative budgetary treatment may indicate potential cuts but lacks clear explanations, leading to ambiguity about its purposes and consequences.
Another critical area involves the "Deficit Neutral Reserve Fund for Investments in National Infrastructure." While this fund is crucial for infrastructural development, the resolution lacks specificity on what investments qualify. This vagueness could create challenges in implementation and accountability.
Additionally, the resolution calls for reducing improper payments by $1 trillion over the next decade, a significant financial commitment. However, there is a lack of detail on the strategies and funding to achieve this, which could impact the policy's effectiveness and accountability.
Analysis of Regulatory and Fiscal Policies
Sections addressing fiscal policies—such as the point of order against increasing long-term direct spending—allow chair-exercised exceptions that might bypass spending limits. This could potentially reduce transparency and accountability in fiscal policymaking.
The "Policy Statement on Government Deregulation" lists extensive financial impacts and takes a strong stance against recent administrations, citing over $1.5 trillion spent through executive actions. However, it lacks a balanced approach, which might hinder bipartisan support necessary for effective fiscal management.
Conclusion
In conclusion, H. CON. RES. 117 involves significant financial allocations and policies aimed at guiding fiscal years 2025 to 2034. However, several issues concerning clarity, implementation, and balance in financial references remain unaddressed. These aspects of the resolution are critical in considering the overall impact of the congressional budget and its various allocations.
Issues
The bill's language is overly complex and difficult to understand, particularly in sections related to budgetary levels and amounts, which could lead to ambiguity in enforcement and interpretation. This issue is found in Sections 1 and 101.
The 'Deficit Neutral Reserve Fund for Investments in National Infrastructure' does not specify what types of investments are considered, leading to potential ambiguity in implementation. This issue is present in Section 301.
The section on 'fair-value credit estimates' lacks a clear definition of the key terms and criteria for calculations, which might lead to inconsistency and ambiguity (Section 205).
The 'Point of Order Against Increasing Long-term Direct Spending' allows for exceptions based on adjustments by the chair of the Committee on the Budget, potentially bypassing spending limits and reducing transparency (Section 201).
There is a lack of specificity regarding consequences and funding for reducing improper payments by $1 trillion over a decade. This issue affects the effectiveness and accountability of this policy (Section 403).
The bill includes a 'Policy Statement on Government Deregulation' with a strong political stance against the current administration, which may be perceived as biased. It lacks balanced assessment, possibly hindering bipartisan support (Section 415).
The bill's provisions on Medicare outline significant challenges but lack specific proposed reforms or actions, which may hinder understanding of intended measures and anticipated impacts (Section 406).
The 'Policy Statement on Economic Growth' promotes extensive deregulation and lower taxes without detailing the economic impacts or balancing considerations for potential downsides (Section 401).
Inadequate justification or explanations for major functional categories' negative budget authority and outlays, such as the category 'Allowances' (Section 102), which could indicate potential cuts without clear purposes.
The 'Limitation on Transfers from the General Fund of the Treasury to the Highway Trust Fund' involves major fiscal reallocations with limited transparency, raising questions on necessity and prioritization (Section 207).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section in the bill specifies or states something that isn't clearly visible due to inadequate content.
1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2025 Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a budget plan for the fiscal year 2025, replacing previous resolutions and setting financial guidelines for the years 2026 to 2034. It includes different titles that cover recommended spending levels, budget enforcement, reserve funds, and various policy statements, focusing on areas like economic growth, healthcare reform, and infrastructure investments.
101. Recommended levels and amounts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the recommended budget levels for U.S. federal finances from fiscal years 2025 to 2034. It lists the projected amounts for federal revenues, new budget authority, budget outlays, deficits, and both the total debt and the debt held by the public.
102. Major functional categories Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the approved budget amounts for different government functions in the United States, such as national defense, international affairs, and health, from 2025 to 2034. It specifies how much money is authorized to be used (budget authority) and how much will be spent (outlays) for each category for each fiscal year in this period.
Money References
- The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate levels of new budget authority and outlays for fiscal years 2025 through 2034 for each major functional category are: (1) National Defense (050): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $921,721,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $884,364,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $932,396,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $910,761,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $940,663,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $921,707,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $961,573,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $943,589,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $983,641,000,000. (B) Outlays, $951,460,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $1,006,040,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $976,545,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $1,029,362,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $997,102,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $1,054,875,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,019,083,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $1,079,250,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,052,673,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $1,104,032,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,070,524,000,000.
- (2) International Affairs (150): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $68,208,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $64,005,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $66,682,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $64,577,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $68,136,000,000. (B) Outlays, $66,371,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $69,496,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $66,768,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $71,023,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $67,975,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $72,524,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $69,091,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $74,102,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $70,256,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $75,684,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $71,549,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $77,311,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $72,925,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $78,943,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $74,282,000,000.
- (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $43,200,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $43,115,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $44,128,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $43,400,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $45,060,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $44,101,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $45,940,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $44,793,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $46,908,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $45,616,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $47,884,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $46,447,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $48,902,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $47,421,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $49,934,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $48,419,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $50,994,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $49,440,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $52,077,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $50,494,000,000.
- (4) Energy (270): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $35,389,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $36,523,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $34,674,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $42,653,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $36,933,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $46,157,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $38,556,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $46,228,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $41,251,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $46,567,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $39,167,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $41,677,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $38,187,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $38,829,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $40,455,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $38,870,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $34,197,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $32,942,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $28,817,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $27,627,000,000.
- (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $77,574,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $75,528,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $78,928,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $83,476,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $72,892,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $85,681,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $74,504,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $82,547,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $76,163,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $80,791,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $77,669,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $78,987,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $79,300,000,000. (B) Outlays, $78,179,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $81,511,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $77,837,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $83,151,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $79,572,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $85,124,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $81,614,000,000.
- (6) Agriculture (350): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $26,808,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $31,376,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $29,215,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $31,145,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $30,603,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $31,660,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $31,783,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $32,256,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $32,839,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $32,136,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $31,053,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $30,186,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $30,061,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $29,158,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $30,501,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $29,236,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $30,740,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $29,468,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $31,012,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $30,072,000,000.
- (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $20,380,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$8,395,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $21,548,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$775,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $17,703,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $8,833,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $16,578,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$40,398,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $5,587,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$4,878,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $14,223,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$800,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $13,939,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$7,311,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $13,062,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$12,314,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $16,371,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$12,511,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $7,180,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$23,482,000,000.
- (8) Transportation (400): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $166,053,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $138,488,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $169,058,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $147,698,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $135,073,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $148,502,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $136,094,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $142,404,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $137,929,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $140,597,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $133,622,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $136,092,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $134,357,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $135,658,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $142,608,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $140,975,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $143,927,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $141,238,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $146,505,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $142,503,000,000.
- (9) Community and Regional Development (450): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $58,613,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,931,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $59,691,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $57,342,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $60,896,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $57,057,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $61,914,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,273,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $63,176,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,046,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $64,449,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,344,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $65,638,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,117,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $66,874,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,168,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $68,096,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $58,121,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $69,477,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $59,091,000,000.
- (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services (500): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $107,932,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $137,483,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $124,883,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $136,134,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $124,064,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $123,578,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $126,949,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $125,533,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $128,547,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $127,556,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $130,445,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $129,535,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $132,538,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $131,488,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $135,010,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $133,831,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $136,986,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $135,933,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $139,741,000,000. (B) Outlays, $138,281,000,000. (11) Health (550): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $776,720,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $774,440,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $759,173,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $756,843,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $716,149,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $708,883,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $723,160,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $713,466,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $752,616,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $734,415,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $769,569,000,000. (B) Outlays, $751,140,000,000. Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $778,478,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $769,501,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $799,992,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $790,580,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $833,092,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $818,550,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $866,907,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $850,546,000,000.
- (12) Medicare (570): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $943,220,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $943,410,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $975,943,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $977,283,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $1,044,829,000,000. (B) Outlays, $1,045,317,000,000. Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $1,190,996,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,191,472,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $1,112,283,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,112,568,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $1,269,580,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,269,902,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $1,354,215,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,354,396,000,000. Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $1,446,338,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,446,523,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $1,662,881,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,663,926,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $1,690,081,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,690,281,000,000.
- (13) Income Security (600): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $672,512,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $664,263,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $641,676,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $639,660,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $630,747,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $625,530,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $642,438,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $643,243,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $636,985,000,000. (B) Outlays, $622,787,000,000. Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $649,645,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $640,106,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $655,236,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $645,096,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $664,455,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $653,363,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $678,472,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $674,272,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $678,902,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $667,745,000,000. (14) Social Security (650): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $61,928,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $61,928,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $72,896,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $72,896,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $78,768,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $78,768,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $82,852,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $82,852,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $87,480,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $87,480,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $92,440,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $92,440,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $97,117,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $97,117,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $102,107,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $102,107,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $107,855,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $107,855,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $113,513,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $113,513,000,000.
- (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $379,832,000,000. (B) Outlays, $373,983,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $403,405,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $410,455,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $426,824,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $427,082,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $449,638,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $467,209,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $469,386,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $445,293,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $490,327,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $486,112,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $510,661,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $506,335,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $531,528,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $527,745,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $553,427,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $573,551,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $575,637,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $575,445,000,000.
- (16) Administration of Justice (750): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $82,693,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $83,635,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $84,818,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $82,645,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $86,985,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $84,591,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $89,174,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $86,628,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $91,531,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $88,588,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $93,928,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $90,972,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $96,449,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $93,586,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $99,289,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $95,885,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $101,225,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $98,341,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $104,043,000,000. (B) Outlays, $101,063,000,000. (17) General Government (800): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, -$50,120,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $25,676,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $26,116,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $32,621,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $31,913,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $36,889,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $33,081,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $36,264,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $33,975,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $36,163,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $34,568,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $35,705,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $35,318,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $35,406,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $36,441,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $21,511,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $37,148,000,000 (B) Outlays, $36,556,000,000. Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $38,334,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $37,730,000,000.
- (18) Net Interest (900): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, $988,406,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $988,406,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, $1,008,814,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,008,814,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, $1,008,279,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,008,279,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, $1,007,445,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,007,445,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, $1,011,962,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,011,962,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, $1,009,960,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,009,960,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, $1,015,815,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,015,815,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, $1,023,756,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,023,756,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, $1,022,459,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,022,459,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, $1,025,284,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, $1,025,284,000,000.
- (19) Allowances (920): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, -$100,210,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$66,930,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, -$102,657,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$87,299,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, -$104,968,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$96,062,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, -$106,901,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$100,845,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, -$109,473,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$104,487,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, -$112,072,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$107,514,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, -$114,754,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$110,277,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, -$117,411,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$112,952,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, -$120,213,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$115,721,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, -$123,105,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$118,546,000,000.
- (20) Government-wide savings and adjustments (930): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, -$164,297,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$63,735,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, -$237,885,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$177,191,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, -$335,075,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$251,251,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, -$504,717,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$427,996,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, -$330,655,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$257,471,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, -$477,197,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$413,266,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, -$511,280,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$449,447,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, -$550,326,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$489,112,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, -$754,126,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$697,913,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, -$659,566,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$605,264,000,000. (21) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950): Fiscal year 2025: (A) New budget authority, -$130,498,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$133,998,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2026: (A) New budget authority, -$134,436,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$140,436,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2027: (A) New budget authority, -$139,823,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$147,373,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2028: (A) New budget authority, -$145,467,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$151,314,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2029: (A) New budget authority, -$149,872,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$151,964,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2030: (A) New budget authority, -$155,250,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$155,641,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2031: (A) New budget authority, -$160,678,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$160,869,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2032: (A) New budget authority, -$171,368,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$171,359,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2033: (A) New budget authority, -$177,274,000,000. (B) Outlays, -$177,365,000,000.
- Fiscal year 2034: (A) New budget authority, -$184,073,000,000.
- (B) Outlays, -$183,664,000,000. ---
201. Point of order against increasing long-term direct spending Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a rule in the House of Representatives that makes it out of order to consider any bill or resolution that would increase direct spending by more than $2.5 billion over any of the four consecutive 10-year periods, unless adjusted by the Budget Committee Chair. The Congressional Budget Office is responsible for estimating such spending impacts, but exceptions are made for certain budget adjustments.
Money References
- (a) Point of order.—It shall not be in order in the House of Representatives to consider any bill or joint resolution reported by a committee, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that would cause a net increase in direct spending in excess of $2,500,000,000 in any of the 4 consecutive 10-fiscal year periods described in subsection (b). (b) Congressional budget office analysis of proposals.—The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall, to the extent practicable, prepare an estimate of whether a bill or joint resolution reported by a committee (other than the Committee on Appropriations), or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, would cause, relative to current law, a net increase in direct spending in the House of Representatives, in excess of $2,500,000,000 in any of the 4 consecutive 10-fiscal year periods beginning with the first fiscal year that is 10 fiscal years after the current fiscal year. (c) Limitation.—In the House of Representatives, the provisions of this section shall not apply to any bills or joint resolutions, or amendments thereto or conference reports thereon, for which the chair of the Committee on the Budget has made adjustments to the allocations, aggregates, or other budgetary levels in this concurrent resolution.
202. Limitation on changes in certain mandatory programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that a "change in mandatory programs" refers to provisions impacting direct spending or receipts that reduce budget authority without decreasing overall spending in the given time frame. It establishes a rule in the House of Representatives that prohibits considering bills with such provisions if they exceed $15 billion in fiscal year 2025, based on estimates from the House Budget Committee chair.
Money References
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—In the House of Representatives, it shall not be in order to consider a bill or joint resolution making appropriations for a full fiscal year that includes a provision that proposes a change in mandatory programs, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that, if enacted, would cause the absolute value of the total budget authority of all such changes in mandatory programs enacted in relation to a full fiscal year to be more than the amount specified in paragraph (2). (2) AMOUNT.—The amount specified in this paragraph is, for fiscal year 2025, $15,000,000,000. (c) Determination.—For purposes of this section, budgetary levels shall be determined on the basis of estimates provided by the chair of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives.
203. Limitation on advance appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the House of Representatives, it is generally not allowed to consider bills that provide advance appropriations, except for some specific programs like certain veteran and Indian health services, and other designated accounts for the fiscal year 2026. An "advance appropriation" is defined as any new budget authority that becomes available after the fiscal year 2025.
Money References
- (b) Exceptions.—An advance appropriation may be provided for programs, projects, activities, or accounts identified in the report or the joint explanatory statement of managers, as applicable, accompanying this concurrent resolution under the following headings: (1) GENERAL.—For fiscal year 2026, under the heading “Accounts Identified for Advance Appropriations” in an aggregate amount not to exceed $28,852,000,000 in new budget authority. (2) VETERANS.—For fiscal year 2026, under the heading “Veterans Accounts Identified for Advance Appropriations”. (3) INDIAN HEALTH ACCOUNTS.—For fiscal year 2026, under the heading “Indian Health Accounts Identified for Advance Appropriations” in an aggregate amount not to exceed the total budget authority provided for such accounts for fiscal year 2025 in bills or joint resolutions making appropriations for fiscal year 2025. (c) Definition.—The term “advance appropriation” means any new discretionary budget authority provided in a general appropriation bill or bill or joint resolution continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2025, or any amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that first becomes available following fiscal year 2025. ---
204. Estimates of debt service costs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the chair of the House Budget Committee to ask the Congressional Budget Office for estimates on how a bill might affect debt service costs. These estimates are advisory only, meaning they are not used for enforcing budget laws, and don't apply to programs funded by discretionary spending but do apply to changes in authorized spending for entitlements.
205. Fair-value credit estimates Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that when requested, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) must provide fair-value estimates for loan programs in addition to the usual estimates. These estimates help the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives ensure the programs comply with budget laws.
206. Adjustments for improved control of budgetary resources Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the House of Representatives, if a bill reduces direct spending and authorizes appropriations, the Budget Committee chair can adjust budget allocations, decreasing the authorizing committee's share while increasing that of the Appropriations Committee for 2025. The Budget Committee chair also has the power to make estimates and adjust budget levels for 2025 to 2034 when enforcing budget resolutions.
207. Limitation on transfers from the general fund of the Treasury to the Highway Trust Fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A bill or resolution that moves money from the Treasury's general fund to the Highway Trust Fund will be recorded as new budget spending for the fiscal year in which the transfer takes place, according to rules followed by the House of Representatives. This aligns with the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and related budget rules.
208. Budgetary treatment of administrative expenses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that in the House of Representatives, when preparing budget allocations for the Committee on Appropriations, the report must include discretionary administrative expenses for both the Social Security Administration and the United States Postal Service. Additionally, estimates of total new budget authority and outlays should also account for these discretionary amounts.
209. Application and effect of changes in allocations and aggregates Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains the rules in the House of Representatives for adjusting budget numbers as part of a resolution, stating that changes take effect when the resolution becomes law and are published in the Congressional Record. It also clarifies that the modified budget figures will be considered official for legislative purposes, and such adjustments will not face certain procedural objections.
210. Adjustments to reflect changes in concepts and definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the chair of the House Committee on the Budget to make adjustments to budget figures in a resolution if there are changes in how budget concepts and definitions are understood, in line with a specific law from 1985.
211. Adjustment for changes in the baseline Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The chair of the House Committee on the Budget can change budget numbers in this resolution if the Congressional Budget Office updates its financial forecasts for the years 2025 to 2034.
212. Exercise of rulemaking powers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that the House of Representatives is using its rulemaking power to adopt certain provisions. These provisions will be part of the House rules and can replace other rules if there are any contradictions. The House also acknowledges its constitutional right to modify these rules at any time, just like any other rule.
301. Deficit neutral reserve fund for investments in national infrastructure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The chair of the House Budget Committee can modify budget levels to support any bill investing in national infrastructure, as long as it does not increase the deficit from 2025 to 2034.
302. Reserve fund for pro-growth tax policies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the House of Representatives, if a bill or joint resolution is proposed to change the tax laws for economic growth and simplifying taxes, the budget committee chair can adjust budget allocations and levels to account for the financial impact of that proposal.
303. Deficit neutral reserve fund for medical innovation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The chair of the House Budget Committee is allowed to change budget figures for legislation related to promoting American medical innovation, as long as these changes do not increase the national deficit from 2025 to 2034.
304. Reserve fund for trade agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that in the House of Representatives, the chair of the Committee on the Budget can change budget amounts in response to bills or resolutions from the Committee on Ways and Means that affect tariffs on imports or involve trade agreements.
401. Policy statement on economic growth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 401, the House states that economic growth significantly influences budget deficits and can be positively impacted by federal policies that support free market principles. The resolution proposes policies to boost economic growth by reducing federal spending, expanding energy production, lowering taxes, cutting regulations, encouraging work, promoting free trade, and restructuring health care.
402. Policy statement on unauthorized appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The House of Representatives states that it is essential for Congress to authorize the money needed for federal programs and agencies, but many programs currently operate without proper authorization. They believe new laws should ensure regular checks on these programs, limit spending if authorizations expire, and stop any funding that goes beyond these limits.
Money References
- (4) According to the Congressional Budget Office, $510 billion in appropriations was attributed to 428 expired authorizations for fiscal year 2023.
403. Policy statement on improper payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses improper payments by the government, highlighting that since 2003, such payments have reached $2.7 trillion with high error rates in programs like Medicaid and Medicare. The policy aims to reduce improper payments by $1 trillion over the next decade by requiring annual reporting, improving information sharing and fraud detection, and holding agencies accountable.
Money References
- (a) Findings.—The House finds the following: (1) The Government Accountability Office defines improper payments as any reported payment that should not have been made or was made in an incorrect amount. (2) Since 2003, improper payments have totaled $2.7 trillion with a reported Federal Government-wide error rate of 5.42 percent in fiscal year 2023.
- (3) Improper payments between 2021-2023 have exceeded $750 billion and totaled more than the budget of the U.S. Army in 2023.
- (b) Policy on improper payments.—It is the policy of this concurrent resolution to lower improper payment rates by $1 trillion over the next decade by working closely with authorizing committees throughout the budget process to— (1) require all Federal programs to annually report improper payment rates; (2) streamline the processes and mechanisms through which information is shared between Federal agencies; (3) task Federal agencies to implement technologies to identify patterns indicative of fraudulent activities or errors, and to enhance eligibility verification processes to ensure that only qualified recipients are receiving benefits; (4) incentivize States and Federal agencies to comply with anti-fraud rules; and (5) hold programs and agencies accountable for continued or prolonged failure to prevent and mitigate improper payments. ---
404. Policy statement on budget gimmick reform Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section emphasizes the need for reforms in the budget and appropriations process to eliminate misleading financial practices, aiming to make Federal spending more transparent and responsible. It outlines the House's commitment to implementing mechanisms like budget caps and stricter emergency spending criteria to ensure fiscal discipline and protect the country's economic future.
405. Policy statement on higher education and the American workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The concurrent resolution on higher education and the American workforce highlights the need for a well-educated workforce, addresses rising tuition costs, and emphasizes financial aid for those most in need, while also aiming to create better opportunities for American workers by improving workforce development programs and supporting economic growth. It proposes policy changes to streamline educational financial aid, remove regulatory barriers, and increase college accountability, as well as to consolidate workforce programs and offer more flexibility to states.
Money References
- (3) With an outstanding student loan portfolio of $1.6 trillion, the Federal Government is the largest education lender to undergraduate and graduate students, parents, and other guarantors.
- (b) Policy on higher education.—It is the policy of this concurrent resolution to promote college affordability, access, and success by— (1) reserving Federal financial aid for those most in need and streamlining grant and loan aid programs to help students and families more easily assess their options for financing post-secondary education; (2) removing regulatory barriers to reduce costs, increase access, and allow for innovative teaching models; (3) increasing accountability for colleges and universities and ensuring students and taxpayers receive a return on investment; and (4) championing policies that achieve these goals, including H.R. 6951, the College Cost Reduction Act. (c) Findings on the American workforce.—The House finds the following: (1) 6.1 million Americans are currently unemployed. (2) Despite billions of dollars in spending, those looking for work are stymied by a broken workforce development system that fails to connect workers with assistance and employers with skilled personnel. (3) American workers and families are facing high inflation, supply chain disruptions, and regulatory barriers that suppress economic growth. (d) Policy on the American workforce.—It is the policy of this concurrent resolution to promote and advocate policies that benefit all American workers and businesses by— (1) further streamlining and consolidating Federal workforce development programs; (2) empowering States with the flexibility to tailor funding and programs to the specific needs of their workforce and employers; and (3) protecting employee freedom, promoting union accountability, supporting independent contractors, updating the Fair Labor Standards Act, and strengthening retirement security for workers and families. ---
406. Policy statement on Medicare Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses the importance of Medicare, highlighting that over 65 million Americans depend on it. It emphasizes the need for Congress to address Medicare’s financial challenges, including the depletion of the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund by 2031, increasing enrollment, unfunded liabilities, and the pressure on the federal budget, and supports finding bipartisan solutions to ensure the program remains sustainable for current and future beneficiaries.
Money References
- The current challenges that Congress will need to address include— (A) the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted in 2031 and unable to pay the full scheduled benefits; (B) Medicare enrollment is expected to increase significantly, as 10,000 baby boomers reach retirement age each day; (C) due to extended life spans, enrollees remain in Medicare three times longer than at the outset of the program nearly six decades ago; (D) notwithstanding the program’s trust fund arrangement, current workers’ payroll tax contributions pay for current Medicare beneficiaries instead of being set aside for their own future use; (E) the number of workers supporting each beneficiary continues to fall; in 1965, the ratio was 4.5 workers per beneficiary, and by 2030, the ratio will be only 2.5 workers per beneficiary; (F) the average Medicare beneficiary receives about three dollars in Medicare benefits for every dollar paid into the program; (G) Medicare is growing faster than the economy, with an average projected growth rate of 7.5 percent per year over the next 10 years; and (H) by 2034, Medicare spending will reach more than $2.2 trillion, more than double the 2023 spending level of $1 trillion.
- (4) Over the next 75 years, the Medicare program faces more than $53 trillion in unfunded liabilities, representing the shortfall of what it will take in today’s dollars to fund promised benefits to beneficiaries.
407. Policy statement on promoting patient-centered health care reform Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section emphasizes the importance of patient-centered health care by advocating for affordable and personalized coverage. It calls for increased competition and transparency in health care markets, encourages innovation, and supports States' flexibility in managing health care programs and insurance regulations to better cater to local needs.
408. Policy statement on medical innovation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines Congress's stance on medical innovation, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the U.S.'s leadership in biomedical advancements by fostering investment and encouraging competition. It supports backing innovators through free-market incentives and calls for reducing regulatory barriers to enhance the development of new medical technologies and treatments.
409. Policy statement on Medicaid work requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses Medicaid work requirements, highlighting that a significant part of the U.S. population uses Medicaid, and suggests that Congress should pass laws requiring able-bodied adults without dependents to work or participate in approved programs to qualify. It also emphasizes that these policies could save taxpayer money, encourage self-reliance, and include regular checks to prevent misuse of Medicaid funds.
Money References
- (6) Medicaid continues to grow at an unsustainable rate; within the decade, the program stands to cost over one trillion dollars per year, between Federal and State spending.
- (7) According to data provided to the Office of Management and Budget, the Federal Government made over $50 billion in improper payments through the Medicaid program in 2023.
- (9) Congress has a responsibility to preserve limited Medicaid resources and taxpayers’ dollars for America’s most vulnerable, including those who cannot provide for themselves.
- (b) Policy on medicaid work requirements.—It is the policy of this concurrent resolution that— (1) Congress should enact legislation, similar to the provisions in the House-passed Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023 (H.R. 2811), that encourages able-bodied adults without dependents to work, actively seek work, participate in a job-training program, or do community service in order to receive Medicaid benefits; (2) legislation implementing work requirements into the Medicaid program could require able-bodied adults without dependents to work, engage in community service, or participate in a work training program for at least 80 hours per month to remain eligible for Medicaid; (3) States should be given flexibility to determine the specific parameters of qualifying program participation and work-equivalent experience; (4) States should perform regular case checks to ensure taxpayer dollars are appropriately spent; and (5) the Government Accountability Office or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General should conduct annual audits of State Medicaid programs to ensure proper reporting and prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. ---
410. Policy statement on combating the opioid epidemic Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section emphasizes the need to combat the opioid epidemic through measures such as securing the southern border to reduce the flow of fentanyl, examining the threat of fentanyl analogues, and spending taxpayer money efficiently. It also highlights the importance of bipartisan efforts to continue supporting policies to prevent substance abuse and collaborating with state, local, and tribal bodies to develop strategies against opioid addiction.
Money References
- (b) Policy on opioid abuse.—It is the policy of this concurrent resolution that— (1) combating opioid abuse using available budgetary resources remains a high priority; (2) the House, in a bipartisan manner, should continue to examine the Federal response to the opioid abuse epidemic and support essential activities to reduce and prevent substance abuse; (3) the Federal Government should secure the United States southern border to reduce the flow of fentanyl and other opioids into the Nation; (4) the House should examine the specific threat posed by fentanyl and fentanyl analogues and support initiatives to reduce the supply of fentanyl in the United States and mitigate its deadly impact on American lives; (5) the House should engage in oversight efforts to ensure that taxpayer dollars intended to combat opioid abuse are spent appropriately and efficiently; and (6) the House should collaborate with State, local, and tribal entities to develop a comprehensive strategy for addressing the opioid addiction crisis. ---
411. Policy statement on border security Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section addresses concerns about border security, highlighting the high number of illegal migrants entering the U.S. since President Biden took office, with significant numbers being released into the country or evading capture. It criticizes the government for failing to uphold its constitutional duties to defend the border and notes that immigration issues are costing taxpayers billions of dollars. The policy statement urges Congress to prioritize border enforcement and follow the Secure the Border Act of 2023 to enhance immigration control.
Money References
- (3) President Biden and Secretary Mayorkas’s catch and release policy is costing the American taxpayer tens of billions of dollars a year.
- In total, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates the cost of all illegal immigrants to the taxpayer to be over $150.7 billion per year.
412. Policy statement on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section highlights the House's concerns about the expanded scope of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and calls for reforms to encourage employment and integrity. It criticizes policies that promote dependency and stresses the need for SNAP to help people become financially independent while ensuring transparency and accountability.
Money References
- (2) President Biden’s 2021 revision to the Thrifty Food Plan was careless, ill-conceived, and poorly executed, resulting in a cost estimate of $425.5 billion over the 10-year period.
413. Policy statement on agriculture Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses the need to improve the Farm Safety Net, which is a collection of federal support programs for farmers. It highlights issues with emergency spending and misuse of funds, suggesting that fixing these problems could save money, which should be reinvested into the programs responsibly to ensure the stability and security of agriculture in the U.S.
Money References
- OMB’s data shows that enhanced program integrity measures at USDA are needed to ensure taxpayer dollars are not wasted or abused.
414. Policy statement on bipartisan fiscal commission Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that the United States is dealing with a major debt problem, with over $34 trillion in national debt, mainly due to spending on Social Security, Medicare, and other government expenses. To tackle this issue, it suggests creating a bipartisan fiscal commission, as proposed by the Fiscal Commission Act of 2024, to review and secure the country's financial future.
Money References
- (a) Findings.—The House finds the following: (1) The United States faces a significant debt crisis, with the national debt currently exceeding $34 trillion. (2) This debt poses a significant risk to the country’s long-term fiscal sustainability, with implications for future generations.
415. Policy statement on government deregulation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section highlights concerns about extensive government regulations that have grown significantly over the decades, emphasizing their economic impact and calling for a rollback of regulations imposed during President Biden's tenure. It outlines the goal to restore congressional powers over regulation and reduce bureaucratic red tape to foster economic growth, supported by specific legislative proposals.
Money References
- (2) Real (inflation-adjusted) spending on regulatory agencies has increased from $4 billion in 1960 to almost $70 billion in 2021 – 17 times the 1960 funding level.
- (3) Moreover, this problem has only gotten worse under President Biden, who has spent over $1.5 trillion through various unilateral and even unconstitutional executive actions since taking office in January 2021.