Overview
Title
An Act to require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to submit to Congress an annual report on projects that are over budget and behind schedule, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023" is a rule that says a special person in the government must tell Congress every year about big projects that are taking much longer or costing much more money than they were supposed to. If a project is taking more than five years extra or costing a billion dollars more than first planned, it gets looked at in this report.
Summary AI
The bill, known as the "Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023," requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to provide Congress with an annual report on projects from specific federal agencies that are significantly over budget or behind schedule. A covered project is defined as one that is either more than five years late or costs $1 billion more than initially estimated. The report must detail various aspects of each project, such as descriptions, costs, completion timelines, and any changes to the original plans. If any information is classified, it can be submitted in a specialized, secure format.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023" proposes a framework to enhance transparency and accountability for federal projects that exceed their budgets and timelines. The bill mandates the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to provide an annual report to Congress, detailing these projects. By identifying significant delays or budget overruns, the legislation aims to scrutinize how federal funds are spent and ensure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
General Summary
This legislative proposal requires a comprehensive reporting system for federal projects that either exceed their initial budget by $1 billion or are more than five years behind schedule. The bill necessitates that detailed information about these projects be included in an annual report. Such details include project descriptions, cost estimates, contractors involved, and explanations for delays or cost increases. Additionally, it allows certain sensitive information to be submitted in a classified format to protect national security interests.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the bill's provisions. Firstly, the criteria defining a "covered project" are somewhat broad and inclusive, potentially encompassing a wide array of projects. This broad scope could dilute the bill's intended oversight, potentially overburdening regulatory bodies with too many projects to consider in depth. Additionally, the thresholds set for budget overruns and delays could exclude projects with smaller but still significant issues, possibly missing critical opportunities for intervention.
Another concern is the provision allowing certain information to be classified. While protecting sensitive information is crucial, this could impair public transparency and reduce accountability, as classified data would not be accessible for public review or oversight. Furthermore, the lack of explicit accountability measures or consequences for projects that do not meet their targets might undermine the bill’s effectiveness in enforcing fiscal discipline.
Impact on the Public
The bill is designed to serve the public interest by aiming to minimize wasteful spending in federal projects. If effectively implemented, it could lead to more responsible use of taxpayer money. By focusing on large-scale overruns, the bill seeks attention towards the most significant fiscal mismanagement cases, potentially leading to cost savings and more efficient government operations.
However, the bill's impact could also be limited by its criteria and the allowance for certain information to be classified. If smaller projects with considerable issues fall through the cracks, or if opacity surrounds significant project information, the public might not benefit fully from the bill's objectives. This lack of insights could lead to missed opportunities to address inefficiencies across different scales of government projects.
Impact on Stakeholders
Government agencies, contractors, and project managers might face additional administrative burdens due to the bill's extensive reporting requirements. Executive agencies and independent regulatory agencies, in particular, would need to develop mechanisms to track and report on covered projects, which might require additional resources and adjustments in project management practices.
On the positive side, such scrutiny could compel these stakeholders to adopt more disciplined and efficient project management procedures. For contractors and federal project partners, enhanced oversight might also lead to tighter contracts and expectations, causing them to prioritize efficiency and accountability to avoid financial scrutiny.
In summary, while the "Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023" seeks to address significant inefficiencies in federal project management, its broad definitions, thresholds, and potential for classified data could limit its effectiveness. Nevertheless, its implementation could lead to more prudent financial management, benefiting both the government and taxpayers if adjustments are made to its oversight mechanisms and transparency parameters.
Financial Assessment
The "Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023" requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to prepare an annual report for Congress on specific federal projects that are over budget or behind schedule. The financial references within this bill center predominantly around identifying and monitoring projects that are significantly over budget by $1 billion or more and those behind schedule by more than five years.
Financial Definitions
The bill lays out specific definitions to determine which projects fall under its purview. A "covered project" is one that has exceeded its cost projections by at least $1,000,000,000 compared to the original estimate or is delayed by more than five years. This focus on large-scale fiscal excesses makes it evident that the bill targets substantial financial overruns and delays that may signify serious budgeting or management issues.
Potential Issues with Financial Scope
One concern, as highlighted in the issues section, is the bill's relatively high threshold for what constitutes a significant overrun. By setting the bar at $1 billion over budget for inclusion, smaller projects with substantial fiscal issues might be overlooked. These smaller overruns, while not meeting the defined threshold, can accumulate and represent significant financial drains, potentially signaling systemic inefficiencies or mismanagement.
Inflation Adjustments and Transparency
The legislation allows for the original cost estimates to be adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. While this ensures that comparisons are made in real terms and reflect current economic conditions, it could also lead to obscured accountability. Adjustments might mask the true extent of overruns, making it difficult for oversight bodies to identify projects that exceed their initial budgets in more significant ways than reported.
Classification and Public Oversight
Financially, the bill also provides for the submission of information in a classified annex if necessary. This could limit transparency and reduce public oversight of projects, particularly those that involve funds on a massive scale, like the ones described in the bill. While classification is crucial for national security, it can also shield critical financial information from the public eye, potentially hiding inefficiencies or misallocations of federal resources.
Absence of Financial Accountability Measures
Although the bill mandates reporting on fiscal overruns and delays, it does not specify any consequence or corrective action for projects that exceed their budget or timelines. This absence of accountability measures might undermine the bill's effectiveness in curbing financial waste. Projects could continue experiencing overruns without facing stringent financial scrutiny or consequences, leading to potential continued fiscal lapses.
In summary, while the "Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023" aims to enhance fiscal oversight for large federal projects, careful consideration of the financial thresholds and the potential for obscured transparency is essential to ensure the effective management of public funds.
Issues
The definition of a 'covered project' in Section 2 is broad and may lead to ambiguity, potentially allowing for the inclusion of a wide range of projects, which could dilute the effectiveness of the oversight intended by the bill.
The criteria set in Section 2 for what constitutes being 'over budget' or 'behind schedule' (5 years behind or $1 billion over budget) may overlook smaller but still problematic overruns, thereby missing significant issues that do not meet this threshold.
The provision in Section 2 that allows the submission of information in a classified annex could hinder transparency and public oversight, as it may limit access to information about covered projects.
There is no mention of checks, accountability measures, or consequences for projects that are over budget or behind schedule in the available sections, which might undermine the bill's effectiveness in enforcing fiscal discipline.
The text does not provide sufficient detail on the implications of the act in Section 1, making it challenging to assess potential risks such as wasteful spending or favoritism.
The original cost and timeline estimates may be adjusted for inflation (as seen in Section 2), which might obscure the extent of overruns and hinder clear accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill, originating from the Senate and designated as S. 1258, is set to pass with amendments. It mandates that the Director of the Office of Management and Budget submit a yearly report to Congress on projects that exceed their budget and timeline.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that this legislation will officially be called the “Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023.”
Money References
- This Act may be cited as the “Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2023”.
2. Annual report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Office of Management and Budget to issue guidance for certain federal agencies to annually report detailed information about projects that are significantly delayed or over budget. This information includes project descriptions, changes, completion dates, cost estimates, and reasons for delays or cost increases, with provisions for classified information to be reported in a secure manner.
Money References
- (a) Definitions.—In this section— (1) the term “covered agency” means— (A) an Executive agency, as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code; and (B) an independent regulatory agency, as defined in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code; (2) the term “covered project” means a project funded by a covered agency— (A) that is more than 5 years behind schedule, as measured against the original expected date for completion; or (B) for which the amount spent on the project is not less than $1,000,000,000 more than the original cost estimate for the project; and (3) the term “project” means a major acquisition, a major defense acquisition program (as defined in section 4201 of title 10, United States Code), a procurement, a construction project, a remediation or clean-up effort, or any other time-limited endeavor, that is not funded through direct spending (as defined in section 250(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900(c))).