Overview

Title

An Act to amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to authorize appropriations for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs.

ELI5 AI

S. 870 is a plan to give more money to help keep people safe from fires and to make nuclear energy better and safer. It includes rules to make sure the money is spent carefully and used to smartly improve both fire safety and nuclear projects.

Summary AI

S. 870 aims to amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to authorize funding for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs. It proposes increasing appropriations for fire safety activities and extending the support deadlines for certain fire-related programs until 2030. In addition, it contains provisions to advance nuclear energy by streamlining licensing processes, encouraging innovation in nuclear technologies, and improving nuclear fuel management to enhance regulatory efficiency and ensure national security. This includes strategies for the development and deployment of advanced nuclear reactors and enabling the nuclear workforce to meet emerging technological needs.

Published

2024-05-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed Amendment House
Date: 2024-05-08
Package ID: BILLS-118s870eah

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
37
Words:
18,521
Pages:
94
Sentences:
271

Language

Nouns: 5,301
Verbs: 1,298
Adjectives: 1,040
Adverbs: 130
Numbers: 897
Entities: 971

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.27
Average Sentence Length:
68.34
Token Entropy:
5.55
Readability (ARI):
36.13

AnalysisAI

The bill, originating from the Senate and passed by the House, seeks to amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, along with authorizing appropriations for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance programs. In addition to fire safety enhancements, it focuses extensively on advancing nuclear energy initiatives, aiming to bolster the United States' position as a leader in nuclear technology. Through various amendments and introductions of reauthorizations, the bill covers a broad range of activities, from funding allocations to regulatory adjustments.

General Summary

The Fire Grants and Safety Act of 2023 amends existing legislation to ensure sustained financial support and updated focus on U.S. fire services and nuclear energy development. With financial allocations directed at firefighter assistance and infrastructure improvements, the bill also emphasizes high technological strides in nuclear energy. It establishes frameworks for international nuclear cooperation, innovation prizes, and updates to licensing procedures and workforce provisions.

Significant Issues

One of the critical issues stems from the potentially large appropriations for firefighter grants, amounting to $750 million annually, without detailed allocation criteria or needs assessments. Similarly, the emphasis on nuclear energy sees significant regulatory shifts, including the extension of foreign ownership rules under strict national security conditions, which could spur debate over foreign influence and security.

The introduction of expedited licensing for nuclear reactors might leave gaps in handling delays, prompting concerns over how such processes are managed and monitored. Modernization efforts around environmental review processes are noted, aiming for efficiency, but they bring apprehension about maintained rigor in oversight.

Public Impact

The public could see broad impacts from this bill, ranging from improved fire safety to enhanced energy technology landscapes. The commitment to substantial funding for fire services ensures continued support and resources for emergency response teams, potentially increasing community safety. However, without clear oversight, these funds could result in inefficient spending or misallocation.

In terms of nuclear energy, the public stands to benefit from advancements in technology that promise cleaner, more sustainable power. Yet, there are also concerns about environmental oversight and governance of newly introduced licensing frameworks, which might lead to apprehensions about public health impacts.

Impact on Stakeholders

For firefighters and emergency services, sustained funding translates into better resources and potentially improved equipment and training. This could significantly enhance operational capacities and firefighter safety. However, the need for detailed auditing and allocation transparency remains critical to avoiding inefficiencies.

Nuclear energy stakeholders, including developers and regulatory bodies, are presented with increased opportunities through incentivized innovation and streamlined processes. Nonetheless, communities residing near sites subject to relaxed environmental reviews might hold environmental and safety concerns. Moreover, entities like the Department of State may find their roles and operations unchanged, but the implications of international negotiations under sectors like nuclear waste management could hold broader diplomatic ramifications.

In conclusion, while the bill aims at developing critical national infrastructure and ensuring safety enhancements, the approach presents both promising developments and significant challenges. Efficient implementation will require careful attention to resource management, stakeholder engagement, and rigorous oversight to balance progress with accountability and transparency.

Financial Assessment

The bill, S. 870, addresses significant financial allocations across various sectors, including fire prevention, nuclear energy, and regulatory efficiency. These allocations have broad implications, as discussed below.

Financial Summary

One of the main financial aspects of the bill is the authorization of appropriations for various programs, especially concerning fire safety and nuclear energy. The Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program is earmarked for $750,000,000 annually from fiscal years 2024 to 2028. Furthermore, the bill allows the United States Fire Administration an allocation of $95,000,000 annually for the same period. These funds are directed towards enhancing fire safety measures, supporting firefighters, and improving overall preparedness.

The bill also proposes financial mechanisms to encourage advancements in nuclear technology. It includes provisions for potential financial awards to entities developing advanced nuclear reactors, aiming to spur innovation in the nuclear sector.

Relation to Identified Issues

A key issue regarding funding is the concern about potential wasteful spending in the Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program. The allocation of $750,000,000 does not come with detailed criteria or an annual assessment framework, which could lead to resources exceeding actual program needs, thereby resulting in inefficient use of taxpayer dollars.

In the context of workforce development, although the bill establishes a traineeship program to meet critical nuclear workforce needs, it lacks explicit budgetary limits. This absence could lead to unchecked spending, thereby affecting transparency and accountability. It raises concerns about how financial resources will be managed to meet workforce needs without overspending.

Additionally, the proposed financial strategy lacks specifics regarding how budget allocations will be sustainably managed over time, particularly without periodic re-evaluation, as seen in the extension of certain fire-related programs to 2030. This could leave substantial resources tied up in potentially outdated or ineffective programs without ensuring continual adaptation to current requirements.

Conclusion

The financial allocations in S. 870 indicate a substantial investment in improving fire safety measures and fostering innovation in nuclear energy. However, they also underscore the necessity for careful oversight in the deployment of these funds to prevent excesses and inefficiencies. Without detailed criteria and a structured assessment framework for these appropriations, there is a risk of financial mismanagement, which needs to be addressed to ensure that taxpayer funds are spent efficiently and effectively to achieve the intended outcomes.

Issues

  • Section 301 and Foreign Influence: Allowing exceptions for foreign ownership of utilization facilities could result in national security concerns, especially with preferential treatment towards specific foreign entities such as those associated with the Republic of India, which may be seen as controversial without explicit criteria for 'not inimical' determinations.

  • Section 3 Funding Concerns: The large appropriation of $750,000,000 for Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program without specifying exact criteria or annual assessment needs could lead to potential wasteful spending if the funds exceed the actual requirements of the program.

  • Section 402 and Workforce Development: The lack of specific budgetary limits for the nuclear energy traineeship raises concerns on unchecked or excessive spending, potentially limiting transparency and accountability in meeting critical workforce needs.

  • Section 104 and National Strategy: The global nuclear energy assessment lacks specificity in budget or funding allocation, potentially leading to inefficiencies and confusion about the study’s implications for foreign policy and national security strategy.

  • Section 4 Extending Programs: Extending the sunset clause to 2030 without periodic re-evaluation of the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant Program raises questions about the necessity and effectiveness of the prolonged program.

  • Section 207 and Licensing Timelines: The expedited procedure for combined license reviews lacks contingency measures for unforeseen delays beyond simple reporting. This might lead to accountability issues and potential delays in the licensing process.

  • Section 102 National Security Provisions: The prohibition on licensing described in this section relies on a joint determination between the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State. Lack of coordination or disagreement could complicate the decision-making process, potentially delaying important national security actions.

  • Sections 501 and 505 Mission and Efficiency: Lack of specific budget constraints or consideration of budget impacts regarding the update of the NRC's mission and licensing efficiency may lead to unchecked spending or resource allocation issues, affecting governmental budget priorities.

  • Section 506 Modernization Concerns: The potential reduction in environmental scrutiny due to quicker processes with fewer detailed assessments could spark public and environmental concerns regarding thoroughness and potential health impacts.

  • Section 201 Fee Structure: Ambiguity in terms such as 'service or thing of value' in fee structures could lead to legal disputes or misunderstandings, potentially affecting fiscal management in nuclear reactor application reviews.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section discusses the passage of a Senate bill (S. 870) that aims to make changes to the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, allowing for funds to be allocated to the United States Fire Administration and programs that assist firefighters.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states that the official name for this part of the legislation is the "Fire Grants and Safety Act of 2023."

2. Reauthorization of the United States Fire Administration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to allocate $95 million annually from 2024 to 2028 for the United States Fire Administration, with $3.42 million each year specifically designated for activities outlined in section 8(f).

3. Reauthorization of Assistance to Firefighters Grants Program and the Fire Prevention and Safety Grants Program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes changes to the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 by extending the expiration date of the Assistance to Firefighters Grants and the Fire Prevention and Safety Grants programs from 2024 to 2030. It also sets funding at $750 million annually from 2024 to 2028 for these programs.

Money References

  • (b) Authorization of appropriations.—Section 33(q)(1) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(q)(1)) is amended by striking “to carry out this section—” and all that follows through “the fiscal year described in clause (i)” and inserting “to carry out this section $750,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028”.

4. Reauthorization of Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grant Program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act by extending the expiration date for a grant program related to fire and emergency staffing from 2024 to 2030. Additionally, it authorizes funding for each of the fiscal years from 2024 to 2028 and removes an outdated funding provision.

5. GAO audit and report Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires that the Comptroller General of the United States conduct an audit and release a public report within three years of the law being enacted. This report should cover the obstacles fire departments face in obtaining federal funds and include information about the United States Fire Administration.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act of 2024 (ADVANCE Act of 2024) aims to promote American leadership in nuclear energy by supporting international nuclear export activities, developing new nuclear technologies, and preserving existing nuclear energy generation. It addresses regulatory, licensing, fuel cycle, and workforce issues while also improving the efficiency of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission through various coordinated efforts and assessments.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides definitions for various terms related to nuclear energy and policy, such as "accident tolerant fuel," "advanced nuclear fuel," "advanced nuclear reactor," and "National Laboratory," as well as specifying relevant government entities like the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

101. International nuclear export and innovation activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines how the Commission should handle international nuclear export and innovation activities, emphasizing the coordination with other government agencies, countries, and institutions to improve nuclear regulation and safety. It also allows for the creation of an "International Nuclear Export and Innovation Branch" to oversee these activities and specifies that these efforts should not be funded by certain fees, with provisions effective from October 1, 2025.

102. Denial of certain domestic licenses for national security purposes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits people in the U.S. from owning or possessing certain nuclear fuel made in Russia or China unless they have a special license. Before issuing a license, the Commission must consult with the Secretaries of Energy and State to ensure that possessing the fuel doesn't threaten national security. If they can't make a decision, no license can be given. The section also clarifies that existing international agreements will not be affected.

103. Export license notification Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, the term “low-enriched uranium” is defined as uranium enriched to less than 20% uranium-235. It also outlines that if certain nuclear items are to be exported to specific countries that haven't agreed to additional nuclear safety protocols, the relevant U.S. Congressional committees must be notified.

104. Global nuclear energy assessment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Energy, along with other officials, to study the global status of the civilian nuclear energy industry and its supply chains. The study must cover various aspects such as risks, environmental benefits, foreign policy roles, and strategic collaborations, and include recommendations for expanding nuclear energy's role in U.S. diplomacy and security. The results must be reported to Congress within 180 days after the study's completion.

105. Process for review and amendment of part 810 generally authorized destinations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Energy, with approval from the Secretary of State, must identify and assess factors for determining which countries can freely receive nuclear technology under part 810 regulations. This includes updating the current process and revising the list of authorized countries at least every five years.

201. Fees for advanced nuclear reactor application review Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act by defining terms related to advanced nuclear reactor applications, clarifying excluded costs in fees, specifying that fees for applicants and pre-applicants cannot exceed certain salary rates, and establishing an expiration date in 2030 for specific provisions. The changes will take effect on October 1, 2025.

202. Advanced nuclear reactor prizes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act to introduce prizes for non-federal entities and the Tennessee Valley Authority that successfully license advanced nuclear reactors. These awards are given in various categories based on accomplishments like being the first to receive a license or using innovative reactor designs, without requiring repayment or dividends.

203. Licensing considerations relating to use of nuclear energy for nonelectric applications Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Commission must report to Congress about special licensing issues for using advanced nuclear reactors in non-electric ways, like creating hydrogen or treating wastewater, within 270 days of the act's enactment. To prepare this report, the Commission will gather input from various stakeholders and consider cost and budget estimates, while suggesting how to address these issues within current or new regulatory frameworks.

204. Enabling preparations for the demonstration of advanced nuclear reactors on Department of Energy sites or critical national security infrastructure sites Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a law related to nuclear energy to include costs for reviewing applications for early site permits to demonstrate advanced nuclear reactors at certain government sites. This change will take effect on October 1, 2025.

205. Fusion energy regulation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to define a "fusion machine" as a device that can transform atomic nuclei through fusion and use the resulting products, and it also updates other laws to incorporate this definition. Additionally, it mandates a report to Congress on establishing licensing frameworks for fusion machines based on approaches like those used for aircraft by the Federal Aviation Administration.

206. Regulatory issues for nuclear facilities at brownfield sites Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, terms like "brownfield site," "covered site," and others related to nuclear facilities at brownfield and retired fossil fuel sites are defined. The section directs the Commission to evaluate and possibly modify regulations to facilitate site licensing, with reports due at specified intervals to Congress.

207. Combined license review procedure Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a fast-track process for obtaining a combined license for a new nuclear reactor if certain qualifications are met, such as using a pre-approved design and building on or near an existing nuclear site. Once an application is lodged, the review process, including safety evaluations and environmental assessments, should ideally be completed within 18 to 25 months. If deadlines are missed, the Commission must inform Congress and provide a plan to address any delays.

208. Regulatory requirements for micro-reactors Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section lays out the framework for how the Commission will develop and implement a licensing and regulatory strategy for micro-reactors within 18 months, including guidelines for staffing, security, and environmental reviews. Additionally, the Commission will consider micro-reactor characteristics, reduce inefficiencies, consult with key stakeholders, and make use of a new regulatory framework over the following three years.

301. Foreign ownership Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines exceptions to prohibitions on certain foreign entities receiving licenses for nuclear facilities. These exceptions apply if the entity is not considered a threat to security or public safety and is backed by specific countries, while excluding those linked to governments or individuals under U.S. sanctions. Additionally, it makes a minor technical correction to the Atomic Energy Act.

401. Report on advanced methods of manufacturing and construction for nuclear energy projects Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Commission to create a report about more modern manufacturing and building methods for nuclear energy projects, seeking input from various stakeholders like industry experts and government officials. The report will explore challenges, opportunities, and safety issues related to these methods, and suggest how to address them within current rules or through new regulations, also including cost and time estimates for updating guidance.

402. Nuclear energy traineeship Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 by defining terms related to nuclear training, such as "advanced nuclear reactor" and "Commission," and establishes a nuclear energy traineeship program. This program involves awarding traineeships at colleges, trade schools, and National Laboratories to meet the needs of the nuclear workforce and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's mission.

403. Biennial report on the spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste inventory in the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines the requirement for the U.S. Secretary of Energy to deliver a report to Congress every two years by January 2026. This report will detail the costs related to breaches of nuclear waste contracts, expenses of storing and managing nuclear waste, projected future costs, and any improvements or actions taken regarding nuclear waste management and technology development.

404. Development, qualification, and licensing of advanced nuclear fuel concepts Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill establishes an initiative by the Commission to improve the process of qualifying and licensing advanced nuclear fuel, requiring collaboration with the Secretary of Energy to share expertise and maintain necessary research facilities. Additionally, within two years, a report detailing progress and challenges will be submitted to Congress, developed with input from various stakeholders, including National Laboratories and industry experts.

501. Mission alignment Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commission to update its mission statement within a year to ensure that the regulation and licensing of radioactive materials and nuclear energy are efficient and do not unnecessarily restrict their use or benefits. Additionally, the Commission must report to Congress with the new mission statement and provide guidance to its staff for effective mission performance.

502. Strengthening the NRC workforce Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to enhance the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) hiring and compensation practices. It gives the NRC Chairman the authority to directly hire highly qualified individuals, offer bonuses for exceptional performance, and adjust salaries for critical positions, while also making provisions for reporting and assessments to ensure effective workforce management through 2039.

Money References

  • — “(1) FOR NEW EMPLOYEES.—The Chairman may pay an individual recruited and directly appointed under subsection (a) a 1-time hiring bonus in an amount not to exceed $25,000.
  • — “(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), an employee or other personnel who the Chairman determines exhibited exceptional performance in a fiscal year may be paid a performance bonus in an amount not to exceed the least of— “(i) $25,000; and “(ii) the amount of the limitation that is applicable for a calendar year under section 5307(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code.

161B. Commission workforce Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the authority of the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to directly hire and compensate exceptionally qualified individuals for specialized positions, bypassing some standard federal hiring procedures, to ensure the Commission can fulfill its responsibilities effectively. It also specifies the limits on the number of such hires, the level of compensation, and provisions for bonuses, as well as the requirement for planning, reporting, and future workforce considerations, with the authority set to expire in 2034, unless extended.

Money References

  • — (1) FOR NEW EMPLOYEES.—The Chairman may pay an individual recruited and directly appointed under subsection (a) a 1-time hiring bonus in an amount not to exceed $25,000. (2) FOR EXISTING EMPLOYEES.
  • — (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), an employee or other personnel who the Chairman determines exhibited exceptional performance in a fiscal year may be paid a performance bonus in an amount not to exceed the least of— (i) $25,000; and (ii) the amount of the limitation that is applicable for a calendar year under section 5307(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code.

503. Commission corporate support funding Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that within three years, a report must be submitted to Congress detailing the progress of specific energy-related regulations and assesses budget goals related to corporate support costs, with amendments to exclude certain expenses from these costs.

504. Performance metrics and milestones Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act by changing a timeframe from 180 to 90 days in two instances. It also requires the Commission to review and update performance metrics and schedules at least every three years to ensure they are as efficient as possible.

505. Nuclear licensing efficiency Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends the Energy Reorganization Act and the Atomic Energy Act to improve the process for licensing nuclear reactors by requiring efficient, timely, and predictable reviews. It mandates the establishment and maintenance of evaluation techniques and guidance for licensing and allows the use of existing information when reviewing applications for permits and licenses at already licensed sites.

506. Modernization of nuclear reactor environmental reviews Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commission to report to Congress on improving the efficiency and predictability of environmental reviews for nuclear reactor license applications, considering various methods and collaborations with other agencies to speed up the process while still meeting legal obligations. The report should also include a timeline for any new rules needed to implement these improvements.

507. Improving oversight and inspection programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines plans to improve nuclear reactor and materials oversight and inspection programs by the Commission, focusing on enhancing efficiency through new technologies, risk-informed procedures, and staff training. It mandates seeking stakeholder input, assessing procedures, encouraging innovation, and recommending actions for improvement without compromising safety standards.

601. Technical correction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 by modifying the conditions under which the Commission may issue licenses for facilities used in research and development. It specifies limits on how much of the facility's operating costs can be devoted to selling energy or nonenergy services, with stricter conditions on the sale of energy.

602. Report on engagement with the Government of Canada with respect to nuclear waste issues in the Great Lakes Basin Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Commission to deliver a report to several Congressional committees within one year, detailing its interactions with the Canadian government concerning nuclear waste issues in the Great Lakes Basin.

603. Savings clause Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The savings clause in Section 603 states that the Act does not change or limit the powers and responsibilities that the Department of State already has.